New Operative Reporting Standards: Where We Stand Now and Opportunities for Innovation

Background: The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer's (CoC) new operative standards for breast cancer, melanoma, and colon cancer surgeries will require that surgeons provide synoptic documentation of essential oncologic elements within operative reports. Prior to designing and implementing an electronic tool to support synoptic reporting, we evaluated current documentation practices at our institution to understand baseline concordance with these standards.

Methods: Applicable procedures performed between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018 were included. Two independent reviewers evaluated sequential operative notes, up to a total of 100 notes, for documentation of required elements. Complete concordance (CC) was defined as explicit documentation of all required CoC elements. Mean percentage CC and surgeon-specific CC were calculated for each procedure. Interrater reliability was assessed via Cohen's kappa statistic.

Results: For sentinel lymph node biopsy, mean CC was 66% (n = 100), with surgeon-specific CC ranging from 6 to 100%, and for axillary dissection, mean CC was 12% (n = 89) and surgeon-specific CC ranged from 0 to 47%. The single surgeon performing melanoma wide local excision had a mean CC of 98% (n = 100). For colon resections, mean CC was 69% (n = 96) and surgeon-specific CC ranged from 39 to 94%. Kappa scores were 0.77, 0.78, -0.15, and 0.78, respectively.

Conclusions: We identified heterogeneity in current documentation practices. In our cohort, rates of baseline concordance varied across surgeons and procedures. Currently, documentation elements are interspersed within the operative report, posing challenges to chart abstraction with resulting imperfect interrater reliability. This presents an exciting opportunity to innovate and improve compliance by introducing an electronic synoptic documentation tool.

© 2021. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Similar articles

Seng SS, Chang JH, Yoo J, Grossi S, Tran Z, Kryzwon L, Swensen S, van Baarsel E, Chen J, Lee E, Jacinto A, Mudgway R, Namm J, Lum SS. Seng SS, et al. J Surg Res. 2020 Sep;253:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.03.041. Epub 2020 Apr 23. J Surg Res. 2020. PMID: 32335394

Donahoe L, Bennett S, Temple W, Hilchie-Pye A, Dabbs K, Macintosh E, Porter G. Donahoe L, et al. J Surg Oncol. 2012 Jul 1;106(1):79-83. doi: 10.1002/jso.23031. Epub 2012 Jan 10. J Surg Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22234931

Carpenter EL, Adams AM, McCarthy PM, Chick RC, Spitzer HV, Nelson DW, Clifton GT, Bowen DK, Krell RW, Vreeland TJ. Carpenter EL, et al. Mil Med. 2023 Jul 22;188(7-8):e1558-e1562. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac274. Mil Med. 2023. PMID: 36111895

White RL Jr, Wilke LG. White RL Jr, et al. Am Surg. 2004 May;70(5):420-4. Am Surg. 2004. PMID: 15156950 Review.

Haid A, Knauer M, Köberle-Wührer R, Wenzl E. Haid A, et al. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2005 Feb;117(4):121-8. doi: 10.1007/s00508-005-0320-4. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2005. PMID: 15847190 Review. German.

Cited by

Elamin A, Walker E, Sugrue M, Khalid SY, Stephens I, Lloyd A. Elamin A, et al. World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Nov 30;18(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00523-6. World J Emerg Surg. 2023. PMID: 38037125 Free PMC article.

Attafuah PYA, Abor PA, Abuosi AA, Nketiah-Amponsah E, Tenza IS. Attafuah PYA, et al. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Sep 22;22(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01998-0. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022. PMID: 36138402 Free PMC article.

O'Connor N, Sugrue M, Melly C, McGeehan G, Bucholc M, Crawford A, O'Connor P, Abu-Zidan F, Wani I, Balogh ZJ, Shelat VG, Tebala GD, De Simone B, Eid HO, Chirica M, Fraga GP, Di Saverio S, Picetti E, Bonavina L, Ceresoli M, Fette A, Sakakushe B, Pikoulis E, Coimbra R, Ten Broek R, Hecker A, Leppäniemi A, Litvin A, Stahel P, Tan E, Koike K, Catena F, Pisano M, Coccolini F, Johnston A. O'Connor N, et al. World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Mar 17;17(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00411-5. World J Emerg Surg. 2022. PMID: 35296354 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Shulman LN, Browner AE, Palis BE, et al. Compliance with cancer quality measures over time and their association with survival outcomes: the Commission on Cancer’s experience with the quality measure requiring at least 12 regional lymph nodes to be removed and analyzed with colon cancer resections. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(6):1613–21. https://doi.org/10.1235/s10434-019-07323-w . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhao B, Tsai C, Hunt KK, Blair SL. Adherence to surgical and oncologic standards improves survival in breast cancer patients. J Surg Oncol. 2019;120(2):148–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25506 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harvey A, Zhang H, Nixon J, Brown CJ. Comparison of data extraction from standardized versus traditional narrative operative reports for database-related research and quality control. Surgery. 2007;141(6):708–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.01.022 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kanters AE, Vu JV, Schuman AD, et al. Completeness of operative reports for rectal cancer surgery. Am J Surg. 2020;220(1):165–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.09.036 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bidwell SS, Merrell SB, Poles G, Morris AM. Implementation of a synoptic operative report for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020;63(2):190–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001518 . - DOI - PubMed